Where cost and efficiency are the prime factors, PSA systems are almost universally the technology of choice. Even when these two decision drivers do not apply, at purities above 99.9%, PSA is the only choice for a gaseous nitrogen generator.
As illustrated in the graph to the right, where capacity or purity requirements are moderate, membrane systems may be an attractive technology when considering both initial investment and cost of operation. Small membrane systems involve fewer parts and assembly and therefore may be less costly to purchase.
However, membrane media is more costly than the CMS used in a PSA. Additionally, as purity increases, the compressed air requirement will rise faster for a membrane system than it will for a PSA. Therefore, as capacity and purity increase, PSA technology overtakes as the most cost effective option.
